What do the brave teens have to say about these tyrannical mandates?

By Teens Against Mandates, strategic partner of The Unity Project

One brave teen wrote this factual, thought-provoking, and pointed essay for her high school AP class on COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Augmentative Essay.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Biden administration imposed a strict vaccination mandate for which there is no alternative compliance option, for most American citizens. Citizens are being coerced into complying with an experimental medical procedure, the data of which is being aggressively suppressed by our governing bodies. The COVID-19 vaccine mandate is deeply unconstitutional, unethical, and violative of our fundamental liberties. As evidenced by the Nuremberg Code, a series of research ethics principles, and other foundational documents on which the United States is predicated, the voluntary, well-informed consent of the human subject in any form of experiment is required in a full legal capacity. The current vaccine program encroaches on citizens’ bodily autonomy, medical and religious freedoms, and medical ethics, and serves as an avenue through which governing bodies can further their agenda onto their respective citizen bodies more effectively. 

People have valid reasons for declining the COVID-19 vaccine. Many individuals base their refusal to undergo medical immunization on medical or religious grounds. However, the freedoms which gave license to such decisions are currently being infiltrated. Individuals are now being labeled as “anti-vax,” an extremely pejorative term, for refusing to comply with something extremely oppressive. However, most were not considered “anti-vax” until government officials actually changed the definition from “someone who opposes the use of vaccines” to “someone who opposes the use of vaccines or regulations mandating vaccination.” This definition change evinces the desire of those in power to further divide our world.

In other parts of the world, the vaccinated and unvaccinated are totally segregated. In Slovenia, the unvaccinated cannot pump gas. In Germany, supermarkets are fenced for each group. In Australia, they are using the military to transfer positives and close contacts to quarantine camps. In Austria, the unvaccinated cannot leave their homes except for in emergency situations. It has been made clear that the current vaccine program is not about public health, but about control. These orders are immoral, and we have an obligation to reject them, codified explicitly at Nuremberg.  

From a Jewish perspective, an individual is forbidden from acting against their moral conscience. The Hasidic Rabbinical court in NYC, having understood this basic tenet as well as our moral obligation to avoid physically dangerous situations, ruled that the COVID-19 vaccination is absolutely forbidden in children and cautioned for adults. It took notice of Israel’s aggressive and ineffective approach towards emergency vaccination after the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla, himself, admitted that “Israel [a country who is at the forefront of this vaccine program] is the world’s biggest laboratory.” 

Experts who are speaking out across all media platforms in objection to the current vaccine program have all either been heavily censored, deplatformed, stripped of their license, or all of the above. Countless doctors have spoken up about the neurophysiological, cardiac, and vascular risks associated with taking the vaccine. In fact, in one of the highest impact cardiology journals, AHA (American Heart Association) Journals, evidence of a plausible biological mechanism of how the mRNA needle may be contributing to increased cardiac events has been recently published, publicizing what many experts already knew. 

Unfortunately, algorithmic censorship—prevention of attention censorship—has been applied to the messages of these experts when shared on digital platforms such as Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, and TikTok. This prevents others from accessing the same knowledge and information for both COVID-19 remedial treatment as well as dangers of the vaccine, both of which are being discreetly shared through on these platforms by these experts; but of course “all scientists agree” when the media censors the ones who don’t. 

For example, doctors could lose their licenses for prescribing Ivermectin, a life-saving medicine that is only legally accessible if given a doctor’s prescription for it. Japan, after their failed vaccine-only strategy, now ignores Big Pharma by practicing safe medicine using early treatment with Ivermectin. Tokyo, in particular, is defeating COVID with Ivermectin, reporting the fewest hospitalized cases since before the pandemic. Millions of accounts and hundreds of monitored studies have insisted that Ivermectin, an inexpensive and off-the-counter medication, is the “COVID Killer.”

Moreover, the COVID-19 vaccine has a horrific safety profile. From a scientific standpoint, the vaccine was manufactured with a relatively new mRNA technology, the inventor of which, Dr. Robert Malone, has warned humans not to receive. He cites the fatal cardiac complications, blood clotting rates, autoimmune diseases, cancer, and damages done to ovarian and testicular function associated with injection as reason enough to turn away from the vaccine. Despite the objections of several credible doctors and scientists, however, Big Tech companies and mainstream media outlets claim to be “more reliable,” utilizing “independent fact-checkers,” the accuracy of which is completely subjective. How can celebrities and influencers such as LeBron James, Adele, or even Big Bird, who are pushing this vaccine on their fanbase, be more reliable than the inventor of the vaccine’s technology, itself?

Perhaps this “misinformation” that “independent fact-checkers” are responsible for restricting has become the information that the media wants its consumers to excuse as “the anti-vax agenda” or “conspiracy theories.” In the Book of Genesis, Noah was also a conspiracy theorist until it rained. So too, the inventor of the mRNA technology with which the COVID-19 vaccine was manufactured was a conspiracy theorist until exactly what he predicted would happen became empirically true.  

 In that vein, research powerfully demonstrates that an individual can be infected with, as well as transmit, COVID, regardless of their vaccination status. Dr. Fauci himself has stated that “[w]hat we’re starting to see now is an uptick in hospitalization among people who’ve been vaccinated but not boosted.” Scientifically speaking, when a person becomes naturally immune to COVID through contagion, they are immune to all the viral proteins of COVID. However, through medical immunization via the vaccine, a person is only immune to the spike protein it contains. Thus, natural immunity is science—just not the revenue generating kind. These conflicts fuel the suspicion of many that the pandemic will never really end, the booster shots will become triannual, and our government will continue to encroach on our freedoms incrementally. 

Further, there is the highest level of corruption happening in the same government agencies which are administering these vaccines. As a result, Americans have become increasingly skeptical of the government’s motivation for administering these vaccines with such aggression. Some have identified the correlation between the influx of capital these pharmaceutical companies receive and the volume of drug shipments throughout the country, summing to billions of dollars since the vaccine rollout. In addition, these corrupt companies are fully legally immune and cannot be held liable in court if errors were to be found in their products. Fundamentally speaking, an individual will sign their rights away to these companies as part of the preliminary paperwork necessary prior to their vaccination. 

It is noteworthy that many of those who control each respective biopharmaceutical industry company are a part of a group of elite individuals. Scott Gottlieb, the former FDA commissioner in charge of regulating Pfizer, is now a current member of the Board of Directors at Pfizer. Stephen Hahn, the former FDA commissioner for regulating Moderna, is now the current Chief Medical Officer of Flagship pioneering, the venture capital firm behind Moderna. James Smith, the CEO of Retuers in charge of informing people about the COVID-19 vaccines, is also a current member of the Board of Directors at Pfizer. Anthony Fauci, the NIAID Director of the National Institutes of Health, is also the funder of bioweapon research on gain of function bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Technology. The same powerful individuals overseeing the production of the COVID-19 vaccine have both previous and current ties to the FDA, which is in charge of approving such vaccines for public use. 

If the FDA and other government-run agencies are corrupt, what does their stamp of approval even guarantee? The FDA has a lengthy history of recalling drugs off shelves due to reports of adverse event reactions, indicating that their judgment—or lack thereof—is neither reliable nor trustworthy. In fact, several drugs are being approved and recalled by the FDA each month. Perhaps, the COVID-19 vaccine is another example of this repetitive human error occurring within the FDA. 

Furthermore, the FDA has requested the courts to keep vaccine information confidential for no less than 75 years. The court rejected their request, and as ordered by the courts, the FDA must release the data on which it based its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer vaccine. The FDA recently produced the first 91+ pages of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine documents from the trial runs, revealing that Pfizer, after just 2 ½ months of vaccine use, received 25,957 reports of “Nervous system disorders.” Additionally in the trials, out of all reported adverse events, about 1:21 is a reported death. The FDA admitted that these were only the recorded adverse events that were considered above mild in the first three months of receiving the shot. 

Moreover, there had been serious integrity issues in the CDC COVID-19 vaccine trials. Credible medical ethics professors such as Brian Lenzkes emphasize how a drug with a higher all-cause mortality rate in the treatment group than in the control group has never been overwhelmingly approved by the FDA and protected by our licensing bodies. In fact, in their virtual meeting back in September, the FDA representative stated: “We were falsely misled by (Pfizer) about the safety of the vaccine...heart attacks are 71x higher than other vaccines…the vaccines are killing two people for every one life saved.” These statistics indicate that more people died in the key clinical trial for Pfizer’s COVID vaccine than the company publicly reported. 

The WHO’s global drug safety surveillance database shows over 2.2 million reported adverse reactions have been caused by COVID-19 vaccines since January 2021. By comparison, only 267,000 reactions from all influenza vaccines have been reported over the past 57 years. In all other cases of vaccine-related deaths reported in the VAERS database, there have been 128 deaths per year. There has never been a medical product brought to market with more than 53 deaths. The last event with such a high volume of vaccine-related death was in the case of the 1976 Swine Flu vaccine, which was immediately suspended after over 50 deaths were recorded. However, in 2021, following the vaccine rollout, reports of death have skyrocketed from a few hundred throughout the 20th and 21st century to tens of thousands. 

In alignment with this government corruption, WHO now says vaccination may be administered by implied consent. This means that when parents send their children to school, and there happens to be a vaccine-drive happening on campus, parents “imply” their consent for their children to be vaccinated without awareness that the vaccination will or has happened. Many schools have started practicing this, criminally marketing, calling students who comply “heroes,” and imposing punitive action on those who refuse. They weaponize peer pressure, isolating students who resist the coercion. Additionally, these schools urge their students “not to tell their parents.” Parents of these students are reasonably horrified, and countless have chosen to take legal action. Administering medicine under the threat of punishment is not medical; it is tyrannical.

Additionally, the VAERS database is a vaccine adverse event reaction reporting system. In a Harvard study conducted by the organization Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, it was found that vaccine injuries are underreported as a condition of the reporting system, with a less than one percent reporting rate to the FDA. What does this tell us about the suppression of data and anecdotal evidence occurring within the database? While the reason may be unknown, it is important to note that only those who have something to hide will work relentlessly to censor those who speak the truth—whether empirical or anecdotal. 

Pro-vax extremists who come across these hundreds of thousands of heartbreaking stories excuse them as “rare,” or “predisposed” cases. Many people have even normalized the negative side effects and permanent injuries caused by the vaccine, citing that myocarditis, heart attacks, and other cardiac issues have always been perfectly normal in young, healthy children and even world class athletes, despite them being the least vulnerable groups in our society.  

While the current vaccine program is vile and unconstitutional on so many levels, most vaccines operate as a tool with which to achieve herd immunity. Since the advent of medical immunization, vaccine mandates—generally within the purview of local governments—have been implemented. Vaccines are one of science’s greatest accomplishments in the field of medicine, having defeated serious diseases such as Polio, Tetanus, Chickenpox, and Measles. Many feel that vaccines are necessary for both the invulnerable and vulnerable populations so that the invulnerable can protect the vulnerable. 

However, there is no ethical reason for taking treatment for somebody else. If the COVID-19 vaccine mandate were about the health of the individual, it would be up to the individual to decide whether or not to receive the treatment. It’s an unethical, immoral, and criminal construct to suggest otherwise. Doctors may prescribe a medication for someone who can benefit from it, and it is up to the individual to decide whether they want to take it. Taking things away from people until they comply is not medical freedom; it is coercion. One’s concern for catching COVID does not override another’s concern for a vaccine injury. People are being forced to choose between their livelihood and their freedom and bodily autonomy, citing severe dangers to the public. The unvaccinated are not a danger to the public. They are a danger to the narrative.

In the story of Exodus, it is estimated that only 10% of Jews left Egypt and reached Israel. Only 10% of our people were able to make the psychological transition from slavery to redemptive thinking. This transition constitutes the collision of two systems which cannot co-exist. It is time for us to make the same transition our ancestors had. 

-Teens Against Mandates