Is Vax Status a Deal Breaker in the Dating Game? #TeenTuesday
Contributing article by Teens Against Mandates
Like generations before us, many teens today are preoccupied with dating and relationships as they develop into young adults and discover more about themselves. When choosing who to date, the usual criteria are at play – personality, attraction, compatibility, and so on. So it may be surprising to anyone that vaccination status would suddenly become another factor.
I know from personal experience that this debate has rocked the boat with countless marriages and serious relationships. Being married to, let alone dating, someone with a differing opinion on the issue can cause both small and big disagreements. It is embarrassing to arrive with your date to a movie theater, bowling alley, or restaurant, only to have to dodge the “Proof of Vax?” question. It doesn’t exactly set the mood for a great rest of the date. From where to go on dates (to avoid the proof of vax policy that establishments used to follow) to where to put the kids in school (to avoid the vax mandate), ‘vax status’ will likely eventually cause division in all kinds of relationships – and not only romantic ones.
As more data emerges regarding the implications of how the vaccine impacts the body long-term, however, vaccine status may become a critical factor in dating. The truth about the vaccine is that we don’t know enough information that describes its effects on reproductive health, but it seems to have more adverse effects than positive ones.
The government’s actions in amplifying propaganda, silencing dissenting voices, and encouraging mass formation are undeniably crimes against humanity. And we don’t know what we don’t know. To make it more confusing, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine have both come out in favor of vaccination. We don’t know what forces these agencies are under, but this adds to everyone’s confusion.
It is entirely acceptable to feel concerned about a rushed and experimental pharmaceutical product whose long-term effects are still unknown. It requires a strong grounding of morals and political positions in order to withstand the pressure to get vaccinated. Previously, everyone was told that those who did not get the vaccine would regret it, but now it seems that the opposite may be the case.
According to biostatistician, Jessica Rose, and her analysis of the VAERS database, the rate of miscarriage, neonatal death, fetal malformations, and adverse events experienced by babies through vaccinated breast-feeding mothers have all skyrcketed. This is also mirrored by a 300% increase in miscarriage rates in DOD (Department of Defense) data, spearheaded by attorney Tom Renz.
Naomi Wolf of the Daily Clout and her team of highly credentialed doctors and scientists have also found highly concerning information pointing to serious adverse events in menstruating women, pregnant mothers, and breastfeeding mothers.
Moreover, based on Canadian doctor Byram Bridle’s FOIA request to the Japanese government for a biodistribution report, the COVID-19 vaccines were not staying in the deltoid muscle of the arm as we were led to believe. In fact, substantial information has confirmed that the nanolipid particles of the vaccine hyper concentrate in the heart, brain, liver, and ovaries. We don’t know what this means.
In light of all the anecdotal data of women experiencing issues with menstruation or having trouble conceiving or carrying a pregnancy to term, where does this leave us? Will vaccination status be a significant criterion for who someone chooses to date? Will there be a reverse-discrimination, where the unvaccinated are weary to date vaccinated? Only time will tell.